Tuesday, 5 August 2014

Size Matters

Are you like me?  Want to eat tasty, nutritious food and lose weight?  It’s not that impossible.  Instead of worrying about points and counting calories, or “can I have this or that” in my allowance, and feeling guilty if you have that “forbidden food”, think of your food in colour, think freshness, think taste, think adventure!  

If it looks good and tastes good, we want it again.  What I am saying is start with having most of the foods you like, but in proportion - and not as often.  You may find that you expect and desire them less as your taste buds change.  For myself, I will never give up the desire to have chocolate
We live in a society that expects treats, and expects self rewards.  Meanwhile, our bodies have to survive the rigours of this life and we need to feed them the best way we can.  We have much more choice than our parents and grandparents ever had, yet we generally are unhealthier, more overweight, and most of us are less active.  Maybe we are making bad choices due to the availability of convenience foods.  

Let me get right to the point.  I am not saying we can only blame the above for the fact that 66% of the population in the UK is overweight, (in the last twenty years this figure has doubled!) but let’s compare a few Items we eat now to what they ate years ago.
Let’s start with our grandparents.  They certainly ate differently to us, mainly due to costs.  There were lots of stews around then.  These were made to last several days – or even more.  They were boiled every day to stop them going bad because there were no refrigerators.  You could have stew two to three days running.  (Have you ever thought of turning your remaining stew into liquidised gravy.  Unlike our ancestors, you can freeze it!  Who says the fussy little ones won’t eat vegetables.)

Our grandparents typically used ten inch plates.  Nowadays plates are often 12 inches or above.  Bowls and cups have also got larger.

The “bun”.  (I mean a small, snack cake rather than a bread bun.)  Years ago, a bun was probably a small sponge cake.  Today, buns are usually much larger and more exotic.  Muffins and cupcakes are very popular but will cost you dearly in more ways than one.  Do you know that there are approx. 250 calories difference between a simple “bun” and a muffin or cupcake.
(As an experiment, take a small piece of muffin and roll it between your fingers.  The amount of fat that comes out will hopefully put you off ever eating a muffin again.  These are definitely “fatty cakes”.)

The good old burger.  It’s now 2-5 times larger in size than when it was first introduced, and is dressed lavishly with extras – not like the simple “Wimpys” of yesteryear.  They have also developed the cheapest way to make these, although the marketing makes them sound full of goodness.  That little baby will cost you over 250 calories without all its “mayo”, etc.  (If you like burgers, try to make them yourself out of meat that you are satisfied is good quality lean minced steak that is typically only 5% fat.  See my recipes for simple instructions for making burgers.  A good quality burger is a healthy snack.)

Now let’s wash it down with a cup of coffee.  Today, an average latte will cost you 330 calories (and, maybe, half an hours work to pay for it)!  It may be as much as 16 oz compared to a simple coffee like we used to be served, which were about 8 oz and 45 calories. 

Pizza.   Two slices of pizza that we might have been served in the past was 500 calories.  Nowadays, two slices of pizza would typically represent 850 calories.  (An extra 350 calories.)  In simple terms, if you normally have 4 slices of pizza a week and your weight was steady say, twenty years ago, the increase in calories would mean that over this time you would have gained 40 lbs due to that fact alone. 

This list goes on and on; it seems we have sacrificed simple and fresh for size and convenience.  And, make no mistake, many of our modern habits stem from the marketing hype which we have been gradually bombarded with that directs us towards wanting what the vendors want us to want for their convenience and profit.

So the “lets nip in and have a cuppa or a burger” will today, cost you hundreds more in calories.  Now, I am not saying don’t have it at all, but ask for a simple coffee (filter, americano, etc.) and share a bun with a companion or buy a biscuit instead.  (Oops, watch the biscuits.  Garibaldis, arrowroot, rich tea and similar biccies are OK in moderation, but watch out for the shortbread, wholemeal and chocolate covered varieties that are very high fat!)  Better still, wait until you get home.  It will cost you less money and you may have had time to talk yourself out of the temptation by then.

To get a general view on the effect of “calories”; it is generally accepted that the average person requires 3500 calories to make a pound of fat, or needs to “give up” 3500 calories to shed a pound of fat.

Of course this is extremely general because it assumes that everything else stays the same (unchanged lifestyle and metabolism) and makes no allowance for people being different – metabolic rates, body types, and so on – and doesn’t discriminate between the different food groups (too little protein input would lead to muscle wasting), but it does give us a “rule of thumb” way of looking at the situation.

Here it is:
If you have a fixed diet, are an average person with normal metabolism and constant weight, and start a twice a week 500 calorie snack habit, you can expect to gain about a pound every month (every three and a half weeks) or around a stone every year.

So four burgers a week makes you put on a stone in a year! 

For burgers, substitute any weekly indulgence with a similar energy value, like 6 pints of beer a week, 12 chocolate digestives a week, 16 hobnobs or bourbon biscuits a week, 24 garibaldis a week, 8 slices of lightly buttered bread a week, 200g of chocolate a week, and so on.  Obviously, half the indulgence would result in half a stone a year
.
Similarly, if we are in a stable situation, denying ourselves 1000 calories a week would lead to losing a stone a year.

What about the effects of exercise on weight loss in sensible terms?
Well, for a 11 stone person, a half hour jog equals a beefburger or a pint of beer.  So does about a half hour of leisurely swimming or of very brisk walking.

(Note that the amount of work done in exercise against your body mass and therefore the amount of calories it represents is directly proportional to your weight.  So a 20 stone person uses twice as much energy as a 10 stone person to accomplish the same physical objective when running or walking.   This is a bit different in the case of swimming, lifting weights, etc.)

To summarise, don’t deny yourself anything in moderation, but offset the effects of indulging in extras by cutting out something else of similar energy value or by doing some exercise.


To help with all this, adopt portion control in order to regulate the proportion of your meal made up of proteins and carbohydrates.  It is always tempting to load your plate with these but you must make sure that you get the right amount of vegetables as well.